Wednesday, January 16, 2008

Good Blogging!

Jane Tallim an Education Specialist says that Media Literacy is “the ability to sift through and analyze the messages that inform, entertain and sell to us every day. It's the ability to bring critical thinking skills to bear on all media— from music videos and Web environments to product placement in films and virtual displays on NHL hockey boards. It's about asking pertinent questions about what's there, and noticing what's not there. And it's the instinct to question what lies behind media productions— the motives, the money, the values and the ownership— and to be aware of how these factors influence content.”

I think that Jane hits the spot when defining media literacy. I think it’s important for us to know this and study this because it’s our society that gets affected daily by the media. We deserve to understand and be aware of what’s going on around us. We may not be interested now, but at the end of the day, it’s our future we have to look forward to and the media is never going to go away. If we are to learn and understand now, maybe not fully but partially, we will stand a better chance in the future.

People have now started to try and explain and expose the media in blogs. It is an easy way for the world to hear what other people have to say about what they think about our society and our media. But what makes a good blog? How can you tell between a good blog and a bad one? I personally think that when writing a blog you need to follow a few helpful tips.

1. Quality beats quantity – you may have a lot to say, but most people don’t want to read a blog that’s 700 words long, they just don’t have time! Make your blog short and informative.
2. Cite! – If you’re going to take someone else’s opinion or pictures you have to cite them properly. If not, you’re stealing!
3. Write about what’s important to you – when writing you should write about things that you want to write about. If you start to write about things that you don’t find interesting, your blog will turn out the same way, uninteresting! You wont put your full emotions and thoughts into something you could care less about.
4. Edit – when reading a blog you don’t want to have to guess what the person is talking about. Make sure you spell check all your work so that people can understand what you mean.

The good thing about blogs is that it lets people express themselves freely for the whole world to hear. It allows you to express your feelings and emotions about our society and our world. Some negative things about blogging is that if you’re up for the comments from other people, it can be ugly. When making your own blog you have to face the facts that some people are not going to agree with you. Some people may nicely disagree, some people will call you names, and some will say you have no idea what you’re talking about. That’s the life of being a blogger, you have to learn how to take criticism and plain ignorance and get past it. You have to keep writing about what’s important to you and not let society tell you what’s right and wrong.

There are many cases where blogs have been brought to the medias attention through television, some good, some bad. There was one case in where a boy from Dawson College in Montreal was a part of a blog site called vampirefreaks.com where he posted many disturbing posts. On September 13, 2006 Gill opened fired at his school where he killed 1 and wounded 9. This is an example of how a blog can turn negative in the media.

-----------------------------------------------------

Rowse, Darren. "Ten Tips for Writing a Blog Post." Pro Blogger. 30 Dec 2005. Darren Rowse. 16 Jan 2008 .

"What is Media Literacy?." Media Awareness Network. 2008. Media Awareness Network. 16 Jan 2008 http://www.media-awareness.ca/english/teachers/media_literacy/what_is_media_literacy.cfm.

Sarah + Sacha = Funny or Racist?




Thirty-eight year old Sarah Silverman is an American comedian, writer and actress. She is best known for her comic stabs at celebrities and the controversial topics such as racism, sexism and religion. You may remember her from her MTV VMA performances where she “attacks” celebrities such as Paris Hilton and the ever so popular Britney Spears. While some would say Sarah is rude and mean other would have to disagree.









Sarah vs. Paris



Sarah Silverman - German Cars



One thing Sarah has seemed to get away with is making racial jokes. In her video “German Cars” where she is spitting out many different stereotypes, there is a scene where she comes up to 2 African American guys and says “ Maybe its like when 2 black guys call each other n******” The dilemma that arises there is the fact of is she allowed to say that? On a recent interview on The View, Joy Behar, Elisabeth Hasselbeck, Rosie O’Donald and Barbara Walters sat down with Silverman and asked her about her racial comments.




Sarah claims that she doesn’t use the word “haphazardly” and that context is everything. So it that any excuse? Just because shes a know celebrity and comedian can she get away with that? Well to be perfectly honest the answer is yes. She has and she will. There is no public uprising about Sarah and her choice of comedy. I personally really enjoy watching Sarah Silverman and I think shes quite hilarious. I don’t think she’s racist at all and I think she just uses it as part of her unique stand up comedy.

Another celebrity that seems to get away with racial comments and actions is Sacha Baron Cohen as "Borat". In his latest movie “Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan.” Sacha crosses many lines as he plays a Kazakhstani journalist, journeying through the United States while interacting with Americans. There was a lot of controversy over this movie because of the racial, sexist and religious comments. Many people sued the producers and directors of this movie, but not much was done. Is that fair enough or should Sacha have gotten a harder punishment? If this was anyone else do you think it would have ended in the same outcome? I personally doubt it and I think that the fact that people know Sacha as controversial comedian and actor, they expected something along these lines. As a viewer I personally found this movie to be very funny, but I did find that it crossed some lines.

Borat Trailor




As for both Sarah and Sacha I find them both extremely funny but at the same time they can push society’s buttons a little to far.

-----------------------------------------------------

"Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan." Wikipedia. 10 Jan 2008. Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.. 16 Jan 2008 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borat:_Cultural_Learnings_of_America_for_Make_Benefit_Glorious_Nation_of_Kazakhstan.
"Sarah Silverman." Wikipedia. 11 Jan 2008. Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.. 16 Jan 2008 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarah_Silverman.

"OSCAR ‘07 Fashion: Gucci? Dolce Gabbana? Channel? Speedo?." The REELot Spot for Independent Writers. 19 Feb 2007. WordPress. 16 Jan 2008 http://www.vecernji.hr/system/galleries/pics/060525/a-borat2.jpg.

"The 21st Annual IFP Independent Spirit Awards." Internet Movie Database. 06 Mar 2006. Internet Movie Database Inc.. 16 Jan 2008 http://i.imdb.com/Photos/Events/4408/SarahSilve_Mazur_7744680_400.jpg.

Monday, January 14, 2008

Boyfriend & Girlfriend

In July 2007, Avril Lavinge was sued by the 70’s pop group The Rubinoos for allegedly ripping off their hit “I Wanna be Your Boyfriend”. When listening to Avril Lavigne’s song “Girlfriend” and the Rubinoos’ song “I Wanna be Your Boyfriend” I probably wouldn’t say that copyright had been broken, but after looking at the similarities I would say that copyright could possibly have been broken.

The lyrics are similar, but only in the chorus. The tempo of girlfriend is a little more upbeat then the Rubinoos’ song but the rhythm is similar. The choruses of both songs are probably what caught the Rubinoos’ attention. The chorus in Avril’s version is, “Hey, hey, you, you I don’t like your girlfriend” and the chorus of the Rubinoos’ song is “ Hey, hey, you, you I wanna be your boyfriend”. The rest of the song lyrics are different.

In my opinion, I don’t think that copyright has been broken. If we were to trust Avril’s statement “They claim that a small part of the lyrics are the same and are saying that I took these from them. I had never heard this song in my life.” to be true, can she really be blamed? It all depends on if you choose to believe her or not. I don’t think Avril would be stupid enough to say she made up the song when she knew from the start that the Rubinoos made it. I think she’s smart enough to ask to borrow songs before she would steal them. If she really did plagiarize that would be a very bad move on her part. It would give her a bad rep and people would know her as “the artist who tried to scam her way to the top.”

In a recent blog written by Avril she writes, “Off the top of my head, two other songs that I can immediately think of with this type of lyric are 'Hey, hey, you, you get off of my cloud' by The Rolling Stones and 'Hey little girl I want to be your boyfriend' by the Ramones. Simply put, I have been falsely accused of ripping their song off. Luke (co-writer) and I have done nothing wrong and there is no merit to their claim." I find this statement to really hit the nail on this issue. There are so many songs that can be similar if you just look at a certain phrase or even if you look at a similar beat, so does that mean they are all ripped off? And if so, who made the original song? In the end, everyone has ripped off everyone once in his or her life. I honestly think that the Rubinoos took it too far and they should have just left it the way it was.


On January 11, 2007 the Rubinoos had dropped the charges against Avril. Terry McBride, Avril’s manager, had previously told the Canadian Press that he might settle out of court to avoid hefty legal fees.

Avril Lavigne - Girlfriend



Click here for full lyrics to "Girlfriend"
Click here for full lyrics to "I Wanna Be Your Boyfriend"

----------------------------------------------

"Avril Lavigne hit with lawsuit over 'Girlfriend' ." CTV. 04 July 2007. CTV GlobeMedia. 16 Jan 2008 http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20070704/Lavigne_lawsuit_070704/20070704/.

"Lavigne lawsuit has limited chances: lawyer." CTV. 05 July 2007. CTV GlobeMedia. 16 Jan 2008 http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20070705/lavigne_law_070705/20070705/.

"Avril Lavigne vs. Plagiarism Claims." Yahoo! News. 2007. Yahoo! News. 16 Jan 2008 http://fcinternet.hwdsb.on.ca/~aaron.puley/MediaLogHandouts/Readings/Copyright/Avril-Plagiarism-Case.pdf.

"Settlement reached in Avril Lavigne 'Girlfriend' lawsuit." The Canadian Press. 09 Jan 2008. The Canadian Press. 16 Jan 2008 http://canadianpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5iRovlnvCVwoBp48U8xcThpMnmlBg.

"Avril Lavigne Goes Trucker." T-Shirt Watch. 16 Nov 2006. WordPress. 16 Jan 2008 http://www.tshirtwatch.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2006/11/avril-lavigne-trucker.jpg.

AvrilBandAids. 2008. Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.. 16 Jan 2008 http://www.petrosh.it/raveup/records/big/rubinoos.jpg.

Weekend Media

During the weekend of September 7 -9, 2007, I encountered several different mediums. Media was everywhere this weekend, especially while driving. I definitely wasn’t surprised with the amount of media I saw and heard about. In just three days I saw a large amount, all in different ways. What I was surprised about was the amount of times I overheard people talking about the celebrity gossip, especially from younger and middle aged people. I didn’t think adults paid that much attention to celebrity gossip because most of the adults I know are more interested in the news and what’s going on around the world. The thing with younger kids that surprised me was that I had no idea that they would be that exposed to all that news. It’s crazy how some people can get the celebrity gossip everywhere so fast and so accessible that even kids of such a young age can read or hear about it. I find that what you hear depends a lot on where you are and if you're paying attention.

I don’t feel that my exposure to media is too much or too little. I think that when I want to know something I’ll look more into it and pay closer attention, but when it comes to something I’m not totally interested in, I tend to pay less attention. If you’re busy and distracted with something, things in the media won’t pop out at you unlike if you’re actually paying attention and listening.

I personally am more likely to listen to celebrity gossip then anything else in the media. I’ll notice Justin Timberlake or Britney Spears before I notice brand names or things happening around the world. For example my attention would be drawn to a conversation about Vanessa Hudgen’s nude pictures on the internet and her job with High School Musical or if Michael Vick is going to jail over his dog fights because that’s where my interests lie.



This weekend I was more affected by the things I watched on TV on Entertainment Tonight and the conversations about celebrities, but that doesn’t mean that the media I chose not to pay closer attention to didn’t affect me. Even though I didn’t pay much attention to brand names or music playing in stores, doesn’t mean I didn’t know they were going on around me. I could tell that I was affected because when I walked out of the store the song that was playing in the store was playing in my head. I may not have completely tuned into the music while in the store, but the fact that it was playing and that I knew the song well, still got me singing it even after I left the store.

I think media affects everyone in a different way and it all depends on who that person is.

Saturday, January 12, 2008

"Reel Arabs" vs Real Arabs

If I had to create a media product to show the correct portrayal of an Arab I would make a website that allows you to interact with the world. It would have different video and audio clips, pictures and write-ups showing people the difference in what media shows us and the real thing. Some examples could be clips from the documentary "Reel Bad Arabs" or the television sitcom "Little Mosque on the Prairie" showing people a good example of how the world is being given the wrong idea about Arabs from movies. These slips would show society what real Arabs are actually like. It would have different polls, quizzes and even a comment box so that you could leave your impression about the whole situation (example at the bottom).

I chose this media type because the Internet is available for everyone, from your own home to the public library. As of September 2007, approximately 1,244,449,601 people worldwide use the Internet, according to Internet World Stats so as one can see the Internet is starting to become easy to use for everyone.

To get the message out there about my website, I would create a commercial advertising the website. It would show clips of Arabs being wrongfully portrayed in a group of videos and then it would cut to a black screen and in white writing it would say, "Look familiar?" then it would flash to another phrase that would say "What about this?". At that time it would shows clips from different movies or TV shows of how Arabs can be portrayed in the correct way. At the end of the commercial it would go to a blank background and say "In the book "Reel Bad Arabs" by Dr. Jack Shaheen, he discovered that out of 1000 films that have Arab and Muslim characters from the year 1896 to 2000, 12 were positive depictions, 52 were even handed, and the rest of the 900 and so were negative" It's good to show the audience the truth about Arabs in films and i think this statistic would help them try to fully understand it more. Lastly it would show the website address and a number that you could call to get more information.

I think that my specific target audience would be teenagers and young adults. I think that since they are the next generation they need to know the absolute truth, and since many to almost every teen and young adult knows how to use an Internet they would be the more likely to visit the website. For those who didn't know how to use the Internet the TV ad would give them a number to call. Along with that, I feel that teens are more easily encouraged because they are prone to having a more open mind about believing in something rather then trying to get an older person to go against everything that they used to believe in.

I think that this website would work very well because you’d be able to get feedback from the quizzes, polls and comments left on the site. People could leave their thoughts, beliefs and personal opinions behind for other people to read. They could also leave their emails in a comment or sign up for a private list to get personal emails back from different writers working for the website or even other people visiting the site. I personally think that this website would allow people to get the true meaning of all Arabs and Muslims.

Do you think the portrayal of Arabs and Muslims in movies is unfair?
Yes
No
Sometimes, depends on the movie
pollcode.com free polls

---------------------------------

"Global Internet Usage." Wikipedia. 25 Dec 2007. Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. 16 Jan 2008 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_internet_usage.

Shaheen, Jack. Reel Bad Arabs. Brooklyn, New York: Olive Branch Press, 2001.

Dixie Sluts

The first thing you have to look at when comparing what happened to the Dixie Chicks, Kanye West and P!nk is the genre of their music. Dixie Chicks are country, Kanye West is hip-hop/rap and P!nk is rock/pop. The fact that Dixie Chicks are country makes it a lot harder for them to say something controversial about the American war and not have it be dealt with in the harshest terms. After Natalie said “ We are ashamed that the President of the United States is from Texas” turned their country fans against them.

What doesn’t make sense is when P!nk wrote a song called “Dear Mr. President” that was extremely controversial against the president she got praised from her fans. P!nk has made her career all about standing out and saying what’s on her mind, even if it does go against our society. In songs such as “Stupid Girls” you can clearly see in the video that she is negatively portraying female celebrities such as Mary Kate Olsen, Lindsay Lohan, Jessica Simpson and Paris Hilton. Her songs usually do have a meaningful message behind them and that’s what makes her fans and parts of society not care about her choice of songs, which is why I think she got away with the song.

Another incident that caused minimal controversy was the outburst from Kanye West during NBC's Hurricane Katrina fundraiser when he said, “George Bush does not care about black people”. Shortly after it happened, Kanye’s statement was quickly forgotten. I personally think that what Kanye had to say was much worse then what Dixie Chicks and even P!nk said. If you look at the difference between the statements, Kanye West made a public claim (that wasn’t true) against George Bush’s reputation, while Natalie Maines made a personal opinion about how she feels about George Bush. Since when does personal opinions get taken far more seriously then public slander? I think it was an unfair move against the Dixie Chicks, when P!nk and Kanye deserved just as much ridicule as they did.

I think the one thing that made these three incidents different was the timing. Dixie Chicks made the claim on March 10, 2003 in London, England, which was a few days before the war started on March 20, 2003. I think that was a main reason they got so much flack, just because the war really hadn’t escalated and people were just getting into supporting their country. They hadn’t seen the outcomes of the war yet and they were still focused on being patriotic. With P!nk, her song came out on April 5, 2006, which gave the country three years to see the effects of the war. In the year 2006 Americans were now stating that George Bush had mislead Americans and that 59% of them said the Iraq war was a mistake. People were now more acceptant to personal opinions about George Bush, good or bad. Lastly, Kanye West made his claim about Bush on September 2, 2005. This also gave Americans time to observe how the war was turning out. The thing that saved Kanye was the fact that he was making so much profit for his label that publicly boycotting his music would have been career suicide.

I personally think that if Natalie Maines was to make that statement now, that her along with Emily Robison and Martie Maguire would not have been so hated. I think that the Americans were just too caught up in “being the perfect, patriotic American” that they failed to see the humour in the situation.


Kanye West and Mike Myers on NBC's Hurricane Katrina Fundraiser


Pink - Dear Mr. President


Dixie Chicks 2006 Tour
--------------------------------------------------------
"Stupid Girls." Wikipedia. 31 Dec 2007. Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.. 16 Jan 2008 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stupid_Girls.
Shut Up and Sing. Dir. Barbara Kopple and Cecilia Peck. Perf. Natalie Maines, Emily Robison, Martie Maguire. DVD. The Weinstein Company, 2006.
"Dixie Chicks Watch: Film Documentary - “Dixie Chicks: Shut Up and Sing” Picked Up for Worldwide Distribution ." FullosseousFlap’s Dental Blog . 22 Aug 2006. WordPress. 16 Jan 2008 http://static.flickr.com/82/222252173_29f798cc12_o.jpg.
"PINK ''I'm Not Dead Tour''." Munchen Tickets. 2007. München Ticket GmbH . 16 Jan 2008 http://www.muenchenticket.de/merchandisingpic.jsp?file=112823.jpg.
"Kanye West feat Young Jeezy - Can’t Tell Me Nothing Remix (NEW LYRICS)." Ali's Basement. 31 July 2007. WordPress. 16 Jan 2008 http://alisbasement.files.wordpress.com/2007/07/kanyeremix.jpg.

Thursday, January 10, 2008

Photo Manipulation

When looking at the different manipulated images today and how they effect women, I think that women get the wrong idea when they see how women are portrayed. What women see on a daily basis walking down the street is what real woman look like, but when they start to look at the billboards and the magazines they start to see an unrealistic image of how the media depicts women. When they see this everyday it can easily cause self image problems. They see the “perfect” women in magazines and advertisements, but in reality those women look nothing like their pictures. Their picture has been so manipulated and modified it’s hard to tell what’s hers and what was created.

What I now know about computer retouching and how much is used in every picture I see makes me wonder what’s real these days? How can I tell if someone actually looks that way or if they were “made” to look that way? I think that with celebrities and models a little touching up isn’t bad, like getting rid of acne or wrinkles, but when you getting so into it that your taking out body parts and changing eye color, you’re crossing the line. For example, in the December 1990 edition of Glamour Magazine, Madonna was put on the cover, but she wasn’t happy with the outcome. They had changed so much about her photo that she didn’t even want it on the cover. The one thing that put Madonna over the edge was the fact that they removed the gap that she loved in between her teeth. They took away what she thought was one of her trademarks. I think there’s times when photo manipulation is necessary, but there is always times when it really isn’t needed. In today’s day and age I think that changing and modifying pictures had gone too far. The media portrays women and men in a certain way that you won’t see everyday. They change reality to their own point of view which causes our point of view to change to theirs.

When looking at the differences between the Newsweek Magazine and the TIME Magazine with the cover of OJ Simpson’s mug shot, you are able to see a definite manipulation of the photo. What TIME Magazine's editor James Gaines had to say about this was " The harshness of the mug shot – the merciless bright light, the stubble on Simpson’s face, the cold specificity of the picture- had been subtly smoothed and shaped into an icon or tragedy. The expression on his face was not merely blank now; it was bottomless. This cover, with the simple, nonjudgmental headline “An American Tragedy”, seemed the obvious, right choice.”

I don’t personally think that TIME magazine was trying to be racist or insensitive. I think they were trying to create a darker illusion to make the picture flow with the title and story of OJ. I don’t think the color of his skin had anything to do with how the photo was changed. I don’t think they needed to do it, but since they did I don’t think that it was that big of a deal. It’s not like they changed his look physically, like facial features, they just dimmed down the light on the photo. When looking at the ethics of photo manipulation, changing the photo to deceive the public is wrong, but I don’t think this photo of OJ deceived people. I think this change was along the lines of ethical and yes some people found it offensive, but not deceiving.

When people interpret images they look at the different things that make the photo what it is. The role that a person’s race, religion, ethnicity and socioeconomic background plays is that it allows people to pick out certain things in the photo that may change their views on it. For example, with the TIME cover of O.J., people that were African American found that TIME Magazine’s cover was racist because it made O.J. look more “sinister and guilty”. It allows your point of view of things to change very easily.

--------------------------------------------------

Rose, Trevor. "YOU and YOUR RIGHTS." The Washington Post Company 19 Dec 2002: 10, 11.

"Pictures That Lie." news.com. 11 Sep 2006. CNET Networks, Inc.. 16 Jan 2008 http://i.n.com.com/i/ne/p/2006/oj_480x318.jpg.

Puley, Aaron. "Blogs." E-mail to 'Michelle'.13 Jan 2008.

Wednesday, January 2, 2008

Interested or Obsessed?

When looking at Britney Spear’s career she has based her career on being "sexy" and having the perfect body all along, so that's what everyone expects to see. At the MTV’s Video Music Awards on September 9, 2007 Britney Spear’s had her “comeback” performance singing her new single “Gimme More”. When looking at the outfit Britney chose it wasn’t the best for the show. I don’t know if it was her who picked the outfit or someone else, but it was not the best choice, especially for the body she has. On the link "Is it fair to savage Britney's figure?" it says "In that ensemble, you just can't have an ounce of anything extra," said Janice Min. I completely agree with this because when you put yourself on stage after being in the media constantly, at something that will be shown all over the world, in front of all those people, singing a brand new song, and wearing that outfit, I can see why people are talking. No, Britney isn’t fat, she's just not as skinny as people are used to her being and that’s why people are talking.



Society always seems to think that they know the whole story when it comes to celebrities. When we read magazines articles about celebrities the writers make us believe we know most or the entire story. They get interviews with “people at the bar they were at” or “friends of the celebrities” but how can we really trust what they have to say. The media like to portray a certain image on celebrities that will entertain magazine buyers. They capture the part of their life that will sell in the media. They made fun of Britney Spears after her VMA performance because there was a time when Britney was on top of the charts and in amazing shape, but at the VMA’s she failed to impress and stand up to her past performances.

People enjoy this because it’s so much easier to talk about people we don’t know, but think we do, rather then about stuff that goes on around us. In an article from ABC News, researchers from universities in the United States and Britain did a study on “Celebrity Worship Syndrome”. They surveyed around 600 people and found that about a third of people have it to some degree. Celebrity Worship Syndrome is a fascination in the lives of the rich and famous that can become a dangerous addiction. Some people believe they know every detail about their favorite celebrity’s life or that one day they will fall in love with them, but in reality the likeliness of that happening is slim. People have become too involved with the media and celebrities that some have forgotten about reality. They blow it off as if it’s not real and they would rather live in the fantasy they have created. People get way too obsessed and make Hollywood drama their life.


Britney's MTV VMA's performance


-----------------------------------------

"Britney Spears Performance Kicks Off MTV Video Music Awards." FOX News. 10 Sep 2007. FOX News Network. 16 Jan 2008 http://www.foxnews.com/images/307574/3_64_090907_VMA_Britney.jpg.

"Celebrity Worship Syndrome: Is America's Obsession With Stardom Becoming Unhealthy?." Propaganda Matrix. 2003. ABC News. 16 Jan 2008 http://www.prisonplanet.com/240903celebrityworship.html.

Tuesday, January 1, 2008

Media at Home

Think about the way you use media in your home. Consider each column of the graphic organizer and indicate how it relates to each media tool.


1. Which family member uses it the most?
2. Which family member uses it the least?
3. Use is restricted?
4. Use is unrestricted?
5. Used mostly for entertainment
6. Used mostly for homework?
7. Expensive to keep running?
8. Cheap to keep running?

1. Favorite

Dad – TV
Mom – Telephone
Ashley – TV
Brittany – Computer
Michelle – Computer

3. Least Favorite

Dad – Telephone (doesn’t like talking on the phone)
Mom – Computer (doesn’t have time to use it/doesn’t know how)
Ashley – Cell phone (doesn’t know how to use it)
Brittany – TV (doesn’t have time to watch TV due to school)
Michelle – Telephone (would rather use computer or cell phone)

3. Yes they do because if you’re a boy you don’t want to play with girl toys and vise versa. It’s like this because boys don’t want their friends thinking they are a “wuss” because they play with “girly” toys. The media has a large effect in this situation because when boys want something to play with, they want it to be something that makes them look “tough” and “manly” like the boys on TV or in advertisements. The same goes with girls, they don’t want to look “butch”, they want to look “cute and pretty”. When talking about age, it goes the same way. A toy for a three year old will not amuse someone who’s sixteen because the intelligence level is very different.

4. My TV is used the most because every person in my house knows how to use it and it is used daily.

5. The cell phone is used the least in my house because only three people have own one. My dad uses it for work, my mom uses it mostly for her drives in and out of work and Brittany uses her less and less because of the cost. My dad only uses his for calls, but Brittany and myself use the cell phone for texting as well.